36 Keyboard Statistics

by

These keyboard figures cover the measurement periods and populations identified in the available source material. Estimates, surveys and forecasts retain their reported scope.

Key Keyboard Statistics

The main findings are:

  • Logitech reported $937.551 million in Keyboards & Combos sales for fiscal 2026, up 6% from fiscal 2025; the category includes PC keyboards and keyboard/mouse combos (fiscal years ended March 31, 2026 and 2025; Logitech worldwide sales).
  • OSHA says a proficient typist can perform more than 18,000 keystrokes per hour under repetitive computer-work conditions (OSHA guidance accessed 2026; no single measurement year stated; General computer workstation context).
  • Mean fingertip contact pressure was 23.6 g/cm² in the 400–500-characters-per-minute group, versus 15.3 g/cm² and 18.2 g/cm² in the lower two groups (study published 2015; 21 male computer workers in South Korea).
  • NIOSH participants worked an average of 6.2 hours per day at a computer (12-month crossover trial reported 2013; Computer operators in the NIOSH study).
  • The prolonged-tablet study compared 3 virtual keyboard designs: standard, wide and split (study published 2015; Healthy adults aged 20–31 using tablets).
  • EPA modeled 1.670 billion keyboards and mice sold cumulatively from 1980 through 2009, counted individually rather than as pairs (1980–2009).
  • Logitech reported $882.643 million in Keyboards & Combos sales for fiscal 2025 (fiscal year ended March 31, 2025; Logitech worldwide sales).
  • In a British national survey, 1,871 of 4,899 non-manual workers were regular keyboard users, defined as more than 4 hours on an average working day (survey published 2001; recall period average working day; United Kingdom, respondents aged 16–64).
  • Mean fingertip acceleration was 5.0 cm/s² in the fastest typing group, versus 2.4 cm/s² and 3.2 cm/s² in the lower two groups (study published 2015; 21 male computer workers in South Korea).
  • In the NIOSH sample, 93% reported neck discomfort at level 2 or higher on a 0–10 scale (baseline in 12-month crossover trial; Computer operators in the NIOSH study).
  • In the tablet study, participants were required to touch-type above 35 words per minute during screening (study published 2015; screening; Healthy adults aged 20–31).
  • EPA modeled 368 million keyboards and mice in use in 2009.
  • Logitech reported $821.441 million in Keyboards & Combos sales for fiscal 2024, compared with $836.432 million in fiscal 2023 (fiscal years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023; Logitech worldwide sales).
  • Among non-manual British workers, one-week prevalence of neck or upper-limb pain was 30% (survey published 2001; preceding 1-week prevalence; United Kingdom).
  • A direct keyboard-loading study found subject mean peak fingertip forces ranging from 1.6 to 5.3 N during five-minute typing tests (study published 1994; Four human participants in a laboratory study).

Contents

Keyboard market scale and sales

Company category combines keyboards with keyboard/mouse combos and is not the whole keyboard market.

Company category combines keyboards with keyboard/mouse combos.

Quarterly company sales are not unit shipments and include combos.

Tablet Accessories is a broader category and primarily, not exclusively, keyboards.

Keyboard use, exposure and workplace repetition

OSHA presents this as an illustrative capability, not a population survey estimate.

Respondents were 12,262 of 21,201 sampled people; regular use was self-reported.

The estimate applies to non-manual workers in the responding sample, not all workers.

Typing speed, skill and mechanical loading

Laboratory comparison of three speed groups; not a causal population risk estimate.

Only four participants typed one standard text for five minutes; values are subject means.

Four-day crossover trial; the standing-versus-stepping comparison was statistically significant but not a general workforce estimate.

Keyboard ergonomics and musculoskeletal outcomes

Average exposure describes the study sample, not all computer operators.

Self-reported baseline discomfort in a selected trial sample; level 2 is not clinical diagnosis.

Approximate source-reported proportion; crossover timing and study attrition limit generalization.

Preference was self-reported in a small crossover sample and does not measure clinical benefit.

Null result applies to this trial’s sample, duration and keyboard models.

Observational adjusted association, not causation; regular use meant more than 4 hours per working day.

Alternative and mobile keyboard performance

The three designs were tested in a controlled experiment and do not represent market shares.

Eligibility threshold, not the population’s average typing speed.

Keyboard end-of-life and recycling

EPA model combines keyboards and mice, uses sales and lifespan assumptions, and counts each separately.

EPA model combines keyboards and mice and does not estimate storage for this category.

EPA model combines keyboards and mice; product weights are modeled inputs.

EPA model combines keyboards and mice and relies on modeled product weights.

EPA model combines keyboards and mice and relies on lifespan and weight assumptions.

Keyboard and mouse rates are combined; rates are model estimates, not a complete national manifest.

Keyboard and mouse rates are combined; rate is a model estimate with substantial uncertainty.

EPA identifies 2010 as projected from earlier estimates; keyboard and mouse rates are combined.

Program-specific collection rates are not national global keyboard recycling rates.

Table of contents